Thursday, October 6, 2011

Blog Grading

Blogs should be graded by you, the teacher.  A blog should not receive a better grade if it is longer than another person's.  They should be graded on the quality, not quantity.  If a blog is really long compared to others, all of it should be completely relevant, as opposed to somebody who may write a shorter blog but gets to the point clearly.  Grammar should not be taken into consideration if the blog is still fully comprehensible.  Writing a blog on this does not show punctuational errors, and not everybody would want to have to write it in a Word document then copy and paste it here.  Once the blog is no longer understandable due to these errors, it should be marked down.  A 3 on a blog post should be a post that: answers all parts of the question, is backed by evidence, and gets the point across clearly.  A 2 would answer the question with some proof, and occasional grammatical errors that might alter the reader's understanding of the post.  A 1 would strictly answer the question, and be very simple in structure without evidence or reasons why.  The only time a 0 should be given is if a blog is not done or if it is an overall mess of what is supposed to be done.

1 comment:

  1. I definitely agree with most of your points except for one contradiction that you made. Quality over quantity is definitely important and relevance is definitely key. The contradiction was with your position on grammar. You said at the beginning that grammar wasn't important but then you said that the number two would be marked down due to grammatical errors. But overall, very good points and this is all very true and very pertinent, especially with the explanations for the grading (3,2,1,0).

    ReplyDelete